The current debate of DST
The United States is divided about the future of DST. Many states want to make it permanent, while others want to return to standard time. Under the Uniform Time Act, states can opt out of DST, but they cannot permanently switch to it. Opting out would mean a state does not have to shift the clocks forward in spring and “fall back” in fall. Instead, the state could choose to stay on standard time year-round.
While DST used to help consumers save energy, studies have shown it has very little impact on modern-day energy usage. Since DST was first established, technological advancements have changed how and when consumers use energy. Today, most homes are filled with devices that consume energy around the clock, such as televisions, computers, and game stations.
Some opponents to DST also argue that it poses a health risk because it doesn’t align with the body’s natural circadian rhythm. A Johns Hopkins study found a connection between changing the clocks and an increase in heart attacks, strokes, and mood disturbances. The study points to less sleep as the culprit for this correlation.
Despite the health risks, many Americans enjoy the elongated hours of sunshine and want to keep DST year-round.